PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NU vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a -30.70% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.11% return.


NU

1D
-3.09%
1M
-15.94%
YTD
-30.70%
6M
-30.20%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NU vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-30.70%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-9.20%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NU and BRK-B is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.22

The correlation between NU and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NU:

$56.96B

BRK-B:

$1.05T

EPS

NU:

$0.65

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

NU:

17.87

BRK-B:

14.49

PEG Ratio

NU:

0.27

BRK-B:

0.56

PS Ratio

NU:

3.24

BRK-B:

2.80

PB Ratio

NU:

4.52

BRK-B:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

NU:

$17.54B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NU:

$7.67B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

NU:

$4.14B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NU vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NU vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.00

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.14

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

-0.30

-0.01

NU vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is comparable to the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.09

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.48

-0.44

Drawdowns

NU vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-53.86%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-9.42%

-28.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-14.95%

-24.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.17%

-9.78%

-28.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.77%

-11.07%

-18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.69%

4.49%

+10.20%

Volatility

NU vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 14.24% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.98%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.24%

3.98%

+10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

10.87%

+18.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

14.38%

+24.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.43%

17.13%

+41.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.43%

19.44%

+38.99%

Dividends

NU vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither NU nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NU vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
4.98B
93.68B
(NU) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NU vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nu Holdings Ltd. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.2%
28.8%
Portfolio components
NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NU and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NU dropped -72.07% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NU and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer