NTSI vs. PPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and PPI (AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PPI.

Performance

NTSI vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NTSI

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 20.90%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: —

PPI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	-0.03%
PPI AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF	-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and PPI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

NTSI vs. PPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NTSI	PPI
Financial Services	25.0%	-
Industrials	17.5%	31.4%
Technology	10.6%	0.6%
Healthcare	10.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.7%	10.6%
Energy	4.8%	23.1%
Communication Services	4.7%	-
Utilities	3.2%	18.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	15.1%

Return for Risk

NTSI vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 37
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTSI	PPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSI	PPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	-2.74	+3.12

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and PPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSI	PPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-1.46%	-32.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-0.59%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-0.79%	-8.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NTSI	PPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	13.05%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	13.05%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	13.05%	+2.58%

NTSI vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than PPI's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSI vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while PPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.51%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%
PPI AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSI and PPI in my portfolio?

NTSI and PPI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NTSI or PPI?

On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSI or PPI?

NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for PPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSI or PPI?

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for PPI.

What is the main difference between NTSI and PPI?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.76% for PPI.