PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPI vs. ETG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PPI vs. ETG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PPI vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than ETG's -8.73% return.


PPI

1D
1.16%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
13.29%
6M
14.21%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETG

1D
2.98%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
0.80%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PPI vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PPI vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPI
PPI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ETG
ETG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPI vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPIETGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

1.13

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

1.73

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.24

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.35

+2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

5.79

+9.94

PPI vs. ETG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the ETG Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and ETG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPIETGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.13

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.36

+0.90

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and ETG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PPI vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than ETG's 7.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPI
AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF
1.04%1.06%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
7.49%6.72%8.03%7.02%9.94%6.02%6.74%6.83%9.08%7.69%8.74%7.93%

Drawdowns

PPI vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and ETG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PPIETGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-74.76%

+55.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-16.64%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-11.20%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-13.55%

+10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.88%

-0.89%

Volatility

PPI vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) is 5.57%, while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PPIETGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

7.67%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

11.90%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

20.21%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

19.73%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

21.17%

-1.77%