NTSI vs. LALT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NTSI returned 14.26%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for LALT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for LALT.

Performance

NTSI vs. LALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than LALT's 10.70% return.

NTSI

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 20.90%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: —

LALT

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 10.70%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: 10.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. LALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	7.18%	30.37%	1.11%	4.92%
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	10.70%	10.79%	8.77%	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and LALT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.37

The correlation between NTSI and LALT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NTSI vs. LALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NTSI	LALT
Financial Services	25.0%	31.4%
Industrials	17.5%	7.7%
Technology	10.6%	22.1%
Healthcare	10.5%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	5.5%
Basic Materials	6.7%	4.4%
Energy	4.8%	5.8%
Communication Services	4.7%	5.2%
Utilities	3.2%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.5%

Return for Risk

NTSI vs. LALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 37
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

LALT

LALT Risk / Return Rank: 93
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. LALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTSI	LALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	3.28	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	4.62	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.65	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	7.79	-6.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	30.25	-24.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTSI vs. LALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the LALT Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and LALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSI	LALT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	3.28	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.62	-1.24

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. LALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than LALT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and LALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSI	LALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-6.97%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-2.87%	-9.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.69%	-6.97%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-0.80%	-1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-0.98%	-8.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	0.74%	+2.63%

Volatility

NTSI vs. LALT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) at 1.23%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSI	LALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	1.23%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	5.40%	+7.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	6.81%	+8.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	5.78%	+9.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	5.78%	+9.85%

NTSI vs. LALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than LALT's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSI vs. LALT - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than LALT's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	3.68%	2.03%	2.06%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.51%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSI and LALT in my portfolio?

NTSI and LALT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTSI or LALT?

NTSI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs LALT's -6.97%.

Which ETF is better, NTSI or LALT?

On 3-year performance, NTSI leads with 14.26% vs 10.48% for LALT. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NTSI or LALT?

Over the 3-year period, NTSI has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSI or LALT?

NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSI or LALT?

LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.51% for NTSI.

What is the main difference between NTSI and LALT?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 1.94% for LALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.