LALT vs. IALT
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while IALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IALT.
Performance
LALT vs. IALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than IALT's 13.14% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IALT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LALT vs. IALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 0.01% |
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 13.14% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and IALT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. IALT — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
IALT
LALT vs. IALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 4.28 | -2.66 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. IALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than IALT's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and IALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -1.47% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.07% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -0.32% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
LALT vs. IALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 7.48% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 7.48% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 7.48% | -1.70% |
LALT vs. IALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than IALT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. IALT - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than IALT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and IALT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IALT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IALT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.12% for IALT.
LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while IALT is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.99% for IALT.
Find the right allocation for LALT and IALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer