NTSI vs. DYTA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NTSI returned 15.78%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for DYTA. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DYTA.

Performance

NTSI vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than DYTA's 9.39% return.

NTSI

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 2.73%
• 6M: 6.15%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.58%

DYTA

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 9.11%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 15.13%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	$304.86K	$303.51K	$292.58K
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	$637.49K	$574.07K	$1.11M

NTSI vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	11.17%	30.37%	1.11%	7.84%
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	9.39%	6.95%	13.59%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and DYTA is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2023	0.69

The correlation between NTSI and DYTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NTSI vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 51
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DYTA

DYTA Risk / Return Rank: 51
DYTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DYTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DYTA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DYTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
DYTA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTSI vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTSI	DYTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.39	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.00	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.63	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	7.97	-1.31

NTSI vs. DYTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the DYTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and DYTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than DYTA's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and DYTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSI	DYTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-9.41%	-24.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-9.33%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.22%	-9.41%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-2.16%	-6.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	1.90%	+1.53%

Volatility

NTSI vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) at 3.39%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSI	DYTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	3.39%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	10.22%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	10.92%	+4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	10.93%	+4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	10.93%	+4.73%

NTSI vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSI vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than DYTA's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	1.50%	1.64%	10.80%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.42%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSI and DYTA in my portfolio?

NTSI and DYTA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTSI or DYTA?

NTSI has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DYTA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs DYTA's -9.41%.

Which ETF is better, NTSI or DYTA?

On 3-year performance, NTSI leads with 15.78% vs 11.77% for DYTA. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NTSI or DYTA?

Over the 3-year period, NTSI has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSI or DYTA?

NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSI or DYTA?

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.50% for DYTA.

What is the main difference between NTSI and DYTA?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 1.04% for DYTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.