DYTA vs. GINX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) and GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYTA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while GINX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DYTA returned 16.37% vs 29.62% for GINX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYTA charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for GINX.

Performance

DYTA vs. GINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYTA achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than GINX's 12.34% return.

DYTA

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 8.77%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 16.37%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 29.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYTA vs. GINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	8.77%	6.95%	8.53%
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	12.34%	25.06%	5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DYTA and GINX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.71

The correlation between DYTA and GINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DYTA vs. GINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYTA

DYTA Risk / Return Rank: 49
DYTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DYTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DYTA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DYTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DYTA Martin Ratio Rank: 53

GINX

GINX Risk / Return Rank: 73
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYTA vs. GINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DYTA	GINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.52	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.53	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	3.45	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	13.18	-3.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DYTA vs. GINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the GINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYTA and GINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DYTA	GINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	2.52	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.39	-0.27

Drawdowns

DYTA vs. GINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYTA drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum GINX drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYTA and GINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYTA	GINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-12.53%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-8.91%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-1.81%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	2.33%	-0.53%

Volatility

DYTA vs. GINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is 2.91%, while SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that DYTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYTA	GINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	3.62%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	9.20%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	11.83%	-2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.85%	13.84%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.85%	13.84%	-2.99%

DYTA vs. GINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYTA has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GINX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYTA vs. GINX - Dividend Comparison

DYTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than GINX's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	1.51%	1.64%	10.80%	0.89%
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	2.17%	2.81%	2.97%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYTA and GINX in my portfolio?

DYTA and GINX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYTA or GINX?

GINX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to DYTA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYTA dropped -9.41% vs GINX's -12.53%.

Which ETF is better, DYTA or GINX?

On 1-year performance, GINX leads with 29.62% vs 16.37% for DYTA. On fees, GINX is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DYTA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYTA or GINX?

Over the 1-year period, GINX has performed better with a 29.62% return vs 16.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYTA or GINX?

GINX is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYTA or GINX?

GINX has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.

What is the main difference between DYTA and GINX?

DYTA is categorized as Global Allocation, while GINX is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for DYTA and 0.98% for GINX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.