NTSI vs. DHS
NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. NTSI is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSI returned 5.55%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for DHS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
NTSI vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return.
NTSI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
NTSI vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 7.18% | 30.37% | 1.11% | 15.42% | -19.27% | 1.76% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 9.88% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSI and DHS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between NTSI and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NTSI vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSI
DHS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
NTSI
DHS
Industrials
NTSI
DHS
Technology
NTSI
DHS
Healthcare
NTSI
DHS
Consumer Cyclical
NTSI
DHS
Consumer Defensive
NTSI
DHS
Basic Materials
NTSI
DHS
Energy
NTSI
DHS
Communication Services
NTSI
DHS
Utilities
NTSI
DHS
Real Estate
NTSI
DHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSI vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
NTSI
DHS
NTSI vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSI | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 3.28 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 12.04 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSI | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.06 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.77 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
NTSI vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSI | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -67.25% | +33.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -6.30% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -11.87% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.01% | -15.28% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -2.60% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -9.55% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 1.71% | +1.66% |
Volatility
NTSI vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSI | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.88% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 7.32% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.95% | 10.01% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 13.89% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 16.08% | -0.45% |
NTSI vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSI vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than DHS's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.35% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.51% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSI and DHS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs DHS's -67.25%.
On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 10.59% vs 5.55% for NTSI. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 10.59% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 3.35% for DHS.
NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.38% for DHS.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSI and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer