DHS vs. SCHD
DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DHS returned 9.64%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DHS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.64%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
DHS
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
DHS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 11.70% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and SCHD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DHS and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DHS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DHS
SCHD
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DHS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
DHS
SCHD
Healthcare
DHS
SCHD
Communication Services
DHS
SCHD
Energy
DHS
SCHD
Utilities
DHS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
DHS
SCHD
Industrials
DHS
SCHD
Technology
DHS
SCHD
Real Estate
DHS
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
DHS
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
SCHD
DHS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 5.24 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 12.71 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -33.37% | -33.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -4.61% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -16.13% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -16.85% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | -33.37% | -3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -2.86% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -3.31% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.90% | -0.17% |
Volatility
DHS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.58% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 7.74% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 11.09% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 14.36% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 16.73% | -0.63% |
DHS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, which matches SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.30% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to DHS (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 9.64% for DHS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS and SCHD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.30%.
DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer