NOFIX vs. NOCBX
NOFIX (Northern Fixed Income Fund) and NOCBX (Northern Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - NOFIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Northern Trust, while NOCBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Northern Trust. Over the past 10 years, NOFIX returned 1.28%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for NOCBX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NOFIX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for NOCBX.
Performance
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOFIX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than NOCBX's -1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NOFIX has outperformed NOCBX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while NOCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.
NOFIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 2.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
NOCBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOFIX Northern Fixed Income Fund | -0.94% | 6.39% | 1.44% | 5.32% | -14.91% | -0.36% | 7.85% | 10.76% | -2.15% | 4.42% |
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | -1.13% | 6.17% | 1.10% | 5.07% | -14.51% | -1.62% | 7.32% | 9.76% | -1.03% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOFIX and NOCBX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2001 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NOFIX and NOCBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOFIX vs. NOCBX — Risk / Return Rank
NOFIX
NOCBX
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOFIX | NOCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 1.34 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NOCBX drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOFIX and NOCBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOFIX | NOCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -20.02% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -3.17% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.54% | -5.54% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -19.95% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.04% | -20.02% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.37% | -6.22% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -2.93% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.36% | -0.01% |
Volatility
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOFIX | NOCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.91% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 2.94% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 3.86% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 6.11% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 5.08% | -0.13% |
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOFIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NOCBX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOFIX vs. NOCBX - Dividend Comparison
NOFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than NOCBX's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 3.69% | 3.14% | 3.82% | 2.99% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 3.58% | 2.75% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.05% | 3.09% |
NOFIX Northern Fixed Income Fund | 3.82% | 3.24% | 3.93% | 3.11% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 3.03% | 3.64% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, NOFIX and NOCBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NOCBX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to NOFIX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOFIX dropped -20.04% vs NOCBX's -20.02%.
NOFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOFIX and NOCBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer