PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOFIX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOFIX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NOFIX has underperformed GUGAX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while GUGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.36% annualized return.


NOFIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.75%
6M
-1.30%
YTD
-0.94%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
1.28%
ALL TIME*
3.92%

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOFIX
Northern Fixed Income Fund
-0.94%6.39%1.44%5.32%-14.91%-0.36%7.85%10.76%-2.15%4.42%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NOFIX and GUGAX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between NOFIX and GUGAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOFIX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOFIX
NOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOFIXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.48

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

4.81

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

13.57

-11.95

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOFIX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOFIX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOFIXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-38.57%

+18.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-1.00%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-5.81%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-20.53%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.04%

-23.06%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-6.72%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-11.25%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.38%

+0.97%

Volatility

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NOFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOFIXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.00%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

1.01%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

2.51%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

6.57%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

5.42%

-0.47%

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NOFIX and GUGAX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

NOFIX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

NOFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than GUGAX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
3.45%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%
NOFIX
Northern Fixed Income Fund
3.82%3.24%3.93%3.11%1.91%2.17%2.77%3.03%3.64%3.33%2.53%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOFIX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOFIX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOFIX dropped -20.04% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOFIX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer