NOC vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, NOC returned 4.32% vs 28.33% for NUKZ. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOC vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -9.31% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 9.01% return.

NOC

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: -9.31%
• 6M: -10.85%
• 1Y: 4.32%
• 3Y*: 5.91%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation	-9.31%	23.61%	1.98%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	9.01%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and NUKZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.03

The correlation between NOC and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NOC vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC

NOC Risk / Return Rank: 45
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 42
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 29
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOC	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.93	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	1.44	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.17	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	1.72	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	4.11	-3.78

NOC vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOC vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOC	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.12%	-33.03%	-38.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.65%	-16.51%	-17.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.88%	-9.20%	-23.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-6.08%	-12.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.09%	6.91%	+6.18%

Volatility

NOC vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 9.31%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOC	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.31%	10.93%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.00%	23.18%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.58%	30.61%	-4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.43%	32.89%	-7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.51%	32.89%	-7.38%

Dividends

NOC vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than NUKZ's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation	1.83%	1.58%	1.72%	1.57%	1.24%	1.59%	1.86%	1.50%	1.92%	1.27%	1.50%	1.64%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.84%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOC and NUKZ in my portfolio?

NOC and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOC or NUKZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to NOC (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.