NOC vs. ASTS
NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. NOC operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ASTS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, NOC returned 9.73%/yr vs 51.99%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NOC vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than ASTS's 13.47% return.
NOC
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 8.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
ASTS
- 1D
- -15.53%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 114.78%
- 3Y*
- 140.29%
- 5Y*
- 51.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NOC vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | -2.75% | 23.61% | 1.93% | -12.79% | 43.02% | 18.40% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 13.47% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and ASTS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, NOC and ASTS have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
NOC:
$78.42B
ASTS:
$23.96B
NOC:
$31.95
ASTS:
-$1.84
NOC:
1.86
ASTS:
257.48
NOC:
4.58
ASTS:
9.00
NOC:
$42.37B
ASTS:
$84.94M
NOC:
$8.69B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
NOC:
$7.50B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOC vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
NOC
ASTS
NOC vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOC | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 2.60 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | 5.06 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOC vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum ASTS drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOC | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -85.57% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.20% | -47.69% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.20% | -70.66% | +39.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.20% | -85.57% | +54.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.03% | -38.08% | +10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -40.51% | +22.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.25% | 24.42% | -12.17% |
Volatility
NOC vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 7.39%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 41.20%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOC | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 41.20% | -33.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.25% | 85.03% | -63.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.55% | 105.98% | -79.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 109.52% | -84.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 111.00% | -85.58% |
Dividends
NOC vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.71% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
Financials
NOC vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NOC and ASTS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (41.20%) compared to NOC (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs ASTS's -85.57%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOC and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer