INO vs. MDU
INO (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and MDU (MDU Resources Group, Inc.) are both stocks. INO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MDU operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, INO returned -40.51%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for MDU. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
INO vs. MDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INO achieves a -61.09% return, which is significantly lower than MDU's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, INO has underperformed MDU with an annualized return of -40.51%, while MDU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
INO
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -44.51%
- 6M
- -58.47%
- YTD
- -61.09%
- 1Y
- -52.66%
- 3Y*
- -51.59%
- 5Y*
- -63.24%
- 10Y*
- -40.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.28%
MDU
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.50M | $2.97M | $3.39M | |
| $23.81M | $27.09M | $35.67M |
INO vs. MDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -61.09% | -4.92% | -70.10% | -67.31% | -68.74% | -43.62% | 168.18% | -17.50% | -3.15% | -40.49% |
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 3.58% | 11.77% | 68.01% | -1.94% | 1.46% | 20.37% | -8.31% | 28.44% | -8.64% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between INO and MDU is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 1998 | 0.11 |
The correlation between INO and MDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INO:
$36.28M
MDU:
$4.17B
INO:
-$48.88
MDU:
$0.92
INO:
0.08
MDU:
1.42
INO:
$0.00
MDU:
$1.81B
INO:
-$1.50M
MDU:
$848.35M
INO:
-$22.01B
MDU:
$528.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INO vs. MDU — Risk / Return Rank
INO
MDU
INO vs. MDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) and MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INO | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 1.61 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 3.65 | -4.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INO vs. MDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INO drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than MDU's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INO and MDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INO | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -62.17% | -37.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.14% | -11.92% | -65.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.27% | -21.48% | -73.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.44% | -22.69% | -76.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.83% | -51.41% | -48.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | -11.92% | -88.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.38% | -14.30% | -78.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.55% | 5.24% | +37.31% |
Volatility
INO vs. MDU - Volatility Comparison
Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) has a higher volatility of 47.66% compared to MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) at 5.26%. This indicates that INO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INO | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.66% | 5.26% | +42.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.50% | 14.69% | +58.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.75% | 21.75% | +65.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.21% | 22.99% | +64.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.96% | 27.12% | +66.84% |
Dividends
INO vs. MDU - Dividend Comparison
INO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 2.81% | 2.77% | 1.89% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.77% | 3.17% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.88% | 2.62% | 4.01% |
Financials
INO vs. MDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MDU Resources Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INO and MDU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INO has higher volatility (47.66%) compared to MDU (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INO dropped -99.97% vs MDU's -62.17%.
MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INO and MDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer