INO vs. MDU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

INO (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and MDU (MDU Resources Group, Inc.) are both stocks. INO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MDU operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, INO returned -37.50%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for MDU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INO vs. MDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) and MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INO achieves a -30.46% return, which is significantly lower than MDU's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, INO has underperformed MDU with an annualized return of -37.50%, while MDU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.

INO

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: 10.00%
• YTD: -30.46%
• 6M: -36.98%
• 1Y: -42.38%
• 3Y*: -44.15%
• 5Y*: -58.19%
• 10Y*: -37.50%

MDU

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -7.83%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 25.39%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: 12.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INO vs. MDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	-30.46%	-4.92%	-70.10%	-67.31%	-68.74%	-43.62%	168.18%	-17.50%	-3.15%	-40.49%
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc.	7.43%	11.77%	68.01%	-1.94%	1.46%	20.37%	-8.31%	28.44%	-8.64%	-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between INO and MDU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 1998	0.11

The correlation between INO and MDU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap INO : $836.13M MDU : $4.31B
EPS INO : -$63.15 MDU : $0.92
PB Ratio INO : 0.14 MDU : 1.48
Total Revenue (TTM) INO : $0.00 MDU : $1.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) INO : -$1.50M MDU : $848.35M
EBITDA (TTM) INO : -$22.01B MDU : $528.72M

Return for Risk

INO vs. MDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INO

INO Risk / Return Rank: 21
INO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
INO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
INO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
INO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
INO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MDU

MDU Risk / Return Rank: 73
MDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MDU Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MDU Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INO vs. MDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) and MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INO	MDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	1.18	-1.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	1.64	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.22	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.56	-3.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	5.61	-6.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INO vs. MDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INO Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the MDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INO and MDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INO	MDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	1.18	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.68	0.58	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.40	0.45	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.45	-0.63

Drawdowns

INO vs. MDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than MDU's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INO and MDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	INO	MDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.95%	-62.17%	-37.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.41%	-9.70%	-53.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.44%	-21.48%	-70.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.13%	-23.58%	-75.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.72%	-51.41%	-48.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.95%	-8.64%	-91.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.35%	-14.33%	-78.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.86%	4.43%	+32.43%

Volatility

INO vs. MDU - Volatility Comparison

Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) has a higher volatility of 22.43% compared to MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) at 5.17%. This indicates that INO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INO	MDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.43%	5.17%	+17.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.21%	14.96%	+51.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.22%	21.61%	+66.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.04%	23.06%	+62.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.38%	27.12%	+66.26%

Dividends

INO vs. MDU - Dividend Comparison

INO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INO Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc.	2.64%	2.77%	1.89%	3.16%	2.88%	2.77%	3.17%	2.74%	3.33%	2.88%	2.62%	4.01%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INO and MDU in my portfolio?

INO and MDU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INO or MDU?

INO has higher volatility (22.43%) compared to MDU (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INO dropped -99.95% vs MDU's -62.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.