NLSIX vs. QQQI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI).

NLSIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Dec 28, 2011. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024.

Performance

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	-3.63%	7.20%	5.60%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	-4.41%	18.62%	19.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's -4.41% return.

NLSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: -3.63%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: 3.47%
• 3Y*: 6.40%
• 5Y*: 4.72%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

QQQI

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 6M: -1.61%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

NLSIX

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

NLSIX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLSIX	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.06	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	1.65	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.25	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	1.82	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	8.28	-5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLSIX	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	1.06	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.88	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and QQQI is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QQQI's 15.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	15.05%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLSIX	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.75%	-20.00%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.39%	-11.46%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-6.66%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-2.31%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	2.52%	-1.33%

Volatility

NLSIX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.89%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLSIX	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	6.11%	-4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.40%	11.18%	-7.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.34%	19.70%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.63%	17.49%	-10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.29%	17.49%	-10.20%