PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSIX vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
-3.63%7.20%7.47%13.10%-2.49%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
2.96%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 2.96% return.


NLSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-3.63%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
6.37%

CLSE

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
2.96%
6M
9.11%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NLSIX vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NLSIX vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NLSIXCLSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

2.19

-1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.87

2.84

-1.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.14

-3.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.31

19.56

-17.25

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NLSIXCLSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.19

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.25

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and CLSE is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and CLSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIXCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-16.45%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-7.88%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-2.53%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-3.73%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.67%

-0.48%

Volatility

NLSIX vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.89%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NLSIXCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

5.68%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

10.35%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34%

14.47%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

13.85%

-7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

13.85%

-6.56%