PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSIX vs. PCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PCRIX's 25.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has outperformed PCRIX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while PCRIX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.89% annualized return.


NLSIX

1D
0.44%
1M
0.29%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.14%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
6.85%

PCRIX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
25.34%
6M
20.93%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
-10.03%
10Y*
-2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.39%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
25.34%17.05%10.59%-68.64%8.94%33.35%0.79%12.29%-13.77%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and PCRIX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.22

The correlation between NLSIX and PCRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLSIX vs. PCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRIX
PCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NLSIXPCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.41

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

5.35

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

16.50

-11.22

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the PCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and PCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NLSIXPCRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.34

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

-0.28

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

-0.11

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

-0.11

+1.07

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum PCRIX drawdown of -88.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and PCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIXPCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-88.17%

+73.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-7.12%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-10.28%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

-78.15%

+67.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

-78.15%

+63.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-79.93%

+79.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-51.81%

+49.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

2.30%

-1.16%

Volatility

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.54%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLSIXPCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

5.13%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

14.12%

-10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

16.27%

-11.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

35.78%

-29.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

27.18%

-19.86%

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLSIX vs. PCRIX - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than PCRIX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
4.05%5.61%8.34%16.19%46.23%22.74%1.56%4.00%5.94%8.14%0.91%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLSIX and PCRIX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRIX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to NLSIX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLSIX dropped -14.75% vs PCRIX's -88.17%.

PCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLSIX and PCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer