NLSIX vs. QLEIX

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's 15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and QLEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QLEIX's 6.18% yield.

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and QLEIX.

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) at 1.26%. This indicates that NLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.