NLSIX vs. QLEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX).
NLSIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Dec 28, 2011. QLEIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2013.
Performance
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | -3.63% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 13.10% | -6.85% | 9.01% | 15.27% | 17.11% | -6.92% | 13.39% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -3.26% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 31.10% | -13.92% | 1.19% | -16.33% | 15.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's -3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
NLSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
QLEIX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NLSIX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
NLSIX
QLEIX
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLSIX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 2.30 | -1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 2.98 | -2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.47 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.88 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 11.49 | -9.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLSIX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 2.30 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 2.21 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 1.10 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSIX and QLEIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison
NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QLEIX's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.81% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Drawdowns
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and QLEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSIX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -38.11% | +23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -6.49% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.79% | -17.07% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.75% | -38.11% | +23.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -3.85% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -7.80% | +5.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.63% | -0.44% |
Volatility
NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NLSIX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.87% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 4.89% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.34% | 8.63% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 10.23% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 10.55% | -3.26% |