PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NLSIX vs. QLEIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and QLEIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.00%
14.80%
NLSIX
QLEIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NLSIX:

1.72

QLEIX:

4.07

Sortino Ratio

NLSIX:

2.35

QLEIX:

5.61

Omega Ratio

NLSIX:

1.32

QLEIX:

1.81

Calmar Ratio

NLSIX:

3.87

QLEIX:

5.42

Martin Ratio

NLSIX:

13.79

QLEIX:

26.50

Ulcer Index

NLSIX:

0.62%

QLEIX:

1.16%

Daily Std Dev

NLSIX:

4.97%

QLEIX:

7.57%

Max Drawdown

NLSIX:

-17.89%

QLEIX:

-42.90%

Current Drawdown

NLSIX:

-1.08%

QLEIX:

-1.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 4.05%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.05% annualized return.


NLSIX

YTD

2.51%

1M

0.58%

6M

4.99%

1Y

7.88%

5Y*

5.01%

10Y*

4.05%

QLEIX

YTD

6.24%

1M

2.65%

6M

14.80%

1Y

29.30%

5Y*

17.39%

10Y*

9.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for QLEIX: current value at 1.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.30%
Expense ratio chart for NLSIX: current value at 1.28% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.28%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NLSIX vs. QLEIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NLSIX is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NLSIX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NLSIX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NLSIX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NLSIX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NLSIX is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QLEIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLEIX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLEIX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLEIX is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLEIX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLEIX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLEIX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NLSIX, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.724.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for NLSIX, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.355.61
The chart of Omega ratio for NLSIX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.321.81
The chart of Calmar ratio for NLSIX, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.875.42
The chart of Martin ratio for NLSIX, currently valued at 13.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0013.7926.50
NLSIX
QLEIX

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and QLEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.72
4.07
NLSIX
QLEIX

Dividends

NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QLEIX's 6.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.02%0.02%0.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.20%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
6.70%7.12%20.80%10.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%4.04%1.86%4.82%8.00%

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -42.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and QLEIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.08%
-1.45%
NLSIX
QLEIX

Volatility

NLSIX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.18%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.18%
1.92%
NLSIX
QLEIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab