PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSE vs. QAI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and QAI is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CLSE vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.59%
3.75%
CLSE
QAI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSE:

2.74

QAI:

1.78

Sortino Ratio

CLSE:

3.69

QAI:

2.53

Omega Ratio

CLSE:

1.47

QAI:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CLSE:

5.04

QAI:

2.61

Martin Ratio

CLSE:

18.13

QAI:

10.61

Ulcer Index

CLSE:

2.06%

QAI:

0.85%

Daily Std Dev

CLSE:

13.63%

QAI:

5.06%

Max Drawdown

CLSE:

-14.28%

QAI:

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

CLSE:

-0.40%

QAI:

-0.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than QAI's 1.24% return.


CLSE

YTD

3.88%

1M

2.81%

6M

12.96%

1Y

34.99%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QAI

YTD

1.24%

1M

1.17%

6M

3.56%

1Y

8.64%

5Y*

2.65%

10Y*

2.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLSE vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for QAI: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSE vs. QAI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSE is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSE is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QAI is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QAI is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QAI is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QAI is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QAI is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QAI is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSE vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.741.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.692.53
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.471.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.005.042.61
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 18.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.1310.61
CLSE
QAI

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and QAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.74
1.78
CLSE
QAI

Dividends

CLSE vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than QAI's 2.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.89%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
2.20%2.23%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%1.34%

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, roughly equal to the maximum QAI drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and QAI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.40%
-0.65%
CLSE
QAI

Volatility

CLSE vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 1.66%. This indicates that CLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.03%
1.66%
CLSE
QAI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab