PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSE vs. FTLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and FTLS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

CLSE vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.59%
6.51%
CLSE
FTLS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSE:

2.74

FTLS:

1.89

Sortino Ratio

CLSE:

3.72

FTLS:

2.56

Omega Ratio

CLSE:

1.48

FTLS:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

CLSE:

4.91

FTLS:

4.32

Martin Ratio

CLSE:

18.90

FTLS:

14.29

Ulcer Index

CLSE:

1.92%

FTLS:

1.34%

Daily Std Dev

CLSE:

13.27%

FTLS:

10.14%

Max Drawdown

CLSE:

-14.28%

FTLS:

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

CLSE:

-3.12%

FTLS:

-2.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 36.96% return, which is significantly higher than FTLS's 19.43% return.


CLSE

YTD

36.96%

1M

-1.31%

6M

8.59%

1Y

36.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FTLS

YTD

19.43%

1M

1.64%

6M

6.50%

1Y

18.94%

5Y*

10.14%

10Y*

8.67%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLSE vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.


FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for FTLS: current value at 1.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.60%
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSE vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.741.89
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 3.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.722.56
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.481.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 4.91, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.914.32
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 18.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.9014.29
CLSE
FTLS

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and FTLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.74
1.89
CLSE
FTLS

Dividends

CLSE vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FTLS's 1.95% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
1.95%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%0.51%

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, smaller than the maximum FTLS drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and FTLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.12%
-2.26%
CLSE
FTLS

Volatility

CLSE vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 3.70%. This indicates that CLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.48%
3.70%
CLSE
FTLS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab