PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSE vs. HTUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CLSEHTUS
YTD Return21.84%13.15%
1Y Return39.21%30.14%
Sharpe Ratio3.482.17
Daily Std Dev11.37%14.95%
Max Drawdown-14.28%-47.47%
Current Drawdown-0.86%-0.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CLSE and HTUS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLSE vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 21.84% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 13.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
41.40%
45.00%
CLSE
HTUS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

Hull Tactical US ETF

CLSE vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for HTUS: current value at 0.97% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.97%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSE vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 3.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.005.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 27.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0027.77
HTUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HTUS, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HTUS, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HTUS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HTUS, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HTUS, currently valued at 8.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.16

CLSE vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLSE and HTUS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.48
2.17
CLSE
HTUS

Dividends

CLSE vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than HTUS's 1.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.99%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
1.05%1.18%7.86%7.20%3.77%0.92%10.57%8.29%3.02%

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and HTUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.86%
-0.05%
CLSE
HTUS

Volatility

CLSE vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 3.12%. This indicates that CLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.86%
3.12%
CLSE
HTUS