NLR vs. GDXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 13.66%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.

Performance

NLR vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -2.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NLR having a 13.66% annualized return and GDXJ not far behind at 13.07%.

NLR

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 35.11%
• 5Y*: 21.94%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

GDXJ

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: 6.26%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 46.12%
• 5Y*: 17.46%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	6.14%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-2.55%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-21.25%	30.40%	40.44%	-11.02%	8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and GDXJ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009	0.35

The correlation between NLR and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (10 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NLR vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NLR	GDXJ
Energy	46.0%	-
Utilities	37.4%	-
Industrials	15.1%	-
Technology	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NLR vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 25
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 35
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLR	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.32	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.74	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.24	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.99	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.93	4.95	-2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLR vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLR	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.32	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.43	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.30	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.06	+0.12

Drawdowns

NLR vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-88.66%	+23.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	-32.92%	+7.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.48%	-32.92%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-50.99%	+20.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.35%	-57.77%	+23.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.80%	-29.01%	+9.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.72%	-60.50%	+24.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.61%	13.19%	-0.58%

Volatility

NLR vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is 13.18%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.18%	16.66%	-3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.83%	41.34%	-8.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.32%	49.79%	-7.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.24%	41.10%	-11.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	44.06%	-20.04%

NLR vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, which matches GDXJ's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.39%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and GDXJ in my portfolio?

NLR and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLR or GDXJ?

GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to NLR (13.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or GDXJ?

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 13.07% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, NLR has been the lower-risk option at 13.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or GDXJ?

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or GDXJ?

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or GDXJ?

NLR and GDXJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.40%.

What is the main difference between NLR and GDXJ?

NLR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.52% for GDXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.