PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NL vs. ACU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NL vs. ACU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NL Industries, Inc. (NL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NL having a 13.40% return and ACU slightly higher at 13.43%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NL having a 11.64% annualized return and ACU not far behind at 11.54%.


NL

1D
-1.15%
1M
-14.66%
YTD
13.40%
6M
9.02%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
11.64%

ACU

1D
2.46%
1M
7.82%
YTD
13.43%
6M
8.41%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NL vs. ACU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
13.40%-22.99%54.90%-13.51%-1.26%60.39%27.43%11.40%-75.37%74.85%
ACU
Acme United Corporation
13.43%9.67%-11.61%100.21%-33.82%13.48%29.39%71.41%-37.83%-6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NL and ACU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.06

The correlation between NL and ACU shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NL:

$293.18M

ACU:

$188.60M

EPS

NL:

-$0.70

ACU:

$2.07

PS Ratio

NL:

1.85

ACU:

1.24

PB Ratio

NL:

0.82

ACU:

1.62K

Total Revenue (TTM)

NL:

$158.58M

ACU:

$150.64M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NL:

$49.27M

ACU:

$59.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

NL:

$3.36M

ACU:

$17.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NL vs. ACU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NL
NL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NL Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ACU
ACU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ACU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ACU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NL vs. ACU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NL Industries, Inc. (NL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLACUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

0.99

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

2.31

-2.31

NL vs. ACU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NL Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the ACU Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NL and ACU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NL vs. ACU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NL drawdown since its inception was -89.08%, roughly equal to the maximum ACU drawdown of -91.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NL and ACU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLACUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.08%

-91.05%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.22%

-20.05%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.90%

-32.71%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

-51.48%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.70%

-52.47%

-32.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.74%

-6.17%

-41.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-38.91%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.90%

8.53%

+3.37%

Volatility

NL vs. ACU - Volatility Comparison

NL Industries, Inc. (NL) has a higher volatility of 29.94% compared to Acme United Corporation (ACU) at 7.05%. This indicates that NL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLACUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.94%

7.05%

+22.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.06%

19.49%

+25.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.29%

32.11%

+23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.74%

40.36%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.76%

42.38%

+21.38%

Dividends

NL vs. ACU - Dividend Comparison

NL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than ACU's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.41%1.54%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
9.83%10.42%9.65%4.99%9.25%3.24%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NL vs. ACU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NL Industries, Inc. and Acme United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M20222023202420252026
40.57M
52.30K
(NL) Total Revenue
(ACU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NL vs. ACU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NL Industries, Inc. and Acme United Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
39.7%
Portfolio components
NL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 40.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.79K and revenue of 52.30K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

NL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.11M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 1.75K and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

NL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.34M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 985.00 and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NL and ACU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NL has higher volatility (29.94%) compared to ACU (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NL dropped -89.08% vs ACU's -91.05%.

ACU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NL and ACU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer