PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NL vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NL vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NL Industries, Inc. (NL) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NL achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than ARLP's 6.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NL has underperformed ARLP with an annualized return of 11.64%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.20% annualized return.


NL

1D
-1.15%
1M
-14.66%
YTD
13.40%
6M
9.02%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
11.64%

ARLP

1D
-3.21%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
6.28%
6M
5.37%
1Y
-0.97%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
42.43%
10Y*
14.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NL vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
13.40%-22.99%54.90%-13.51%-1.26%60.39%27.43%11.40%-75.37%74.85%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
6.28%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-28.90%-1.90%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NL and ARLP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1999

0.19

The correlation between NL and ARLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NL:

$293.18M

ARLP:

$3.02B

EPS

NL:

-$0.70

ARLP:

$72.64

PS Ratio

NL:

1.85

ARLP:

0.01

PB Ratio

NL:

0.82

ARLP:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

NL:

$158.58M

ARLP:

$517.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NL:

$49.27M

ARLP:

$353.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

NL:

$3.36M

ARLP:

$82.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NL vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NL
NL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NL Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NL vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NL Industries, Inc. (NL) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.01

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

-0.06

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

-0.10

+0.11

NL vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NL Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NL and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NL vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NL drawdown since its inception was -89.08%, roughly equal to the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NL and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.08%

-90.52%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.22%

-17.62%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.90%

-20.83%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

-29.13%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.70%

-85.26%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.74%

-16.92%

-30.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-24.31%

-19.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.90%

9.61%

+2.29%

Volatility

NL vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

NL Industries, Inc. (NL) has a higher volatility of 29.94% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 5.90%. This indicates that NL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.94%

5.90%

+24.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.06%

16.10%

+28.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.29%

23.04%

+32.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.74%

33.44%

+15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.76%

50.20%

+13.56%

Dividends

NL vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

NL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, less than ARLP's 10.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.20%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
9.83%10.42%9.65%4.99%9.25%3.24%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NL vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NL Industries, Inc. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20222023202420252026
40.57M
516.02B
(NL) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NL vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NL Industries, Inc. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
0
Portfolio components
NL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 40.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.11M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

NL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.34M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NL and ARLP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NL has higher volatility (29.94%) compared to ARLP (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NL dropped -89.08% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

NL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NL and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer