PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJUL vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJUL vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


NJUL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.39%
YTD
6.16%
6M
6.40%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJUL vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NJUL and QB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.73

NJUL vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NJUL
QB

Technology

54.2%
49.9%

Communication Services

15.5%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.3%

Industrials

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.3%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

NJUL
54.2%
QB
49.9%

Communication Services

NJUL
15.5%
QB
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NJUL
12.2%
QB
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

NJUL
7.6%
QB
8.6%

Healthcare

NJUL
4.2%
QB
5.3%

Industrials

NJUL
2.8%
QB
3.7%

Utilities

NJUL
1.4%
QB
1.6%

Basic Materials

NJUL
1.2%
QB
1.3%

Energy

NJUL
0.6%
QB
0.6%

Financial Services

NJUL
0.2%
QB
0.2%

Real Estate

NJUL
0.1%
QB
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJUL vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJUL
NJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJUL vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NJULQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.60

NJUL vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NJULQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

3.17

-2.16

Drawdowns

NJUL vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJULQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.37%

-1.83%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-0.34%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

Volatility

NJUL vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJULQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

5.75%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.56%

5.75%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

5.75%

+5.31%

NJUL vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

NJUL vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

NJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NJUL and QB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUL.

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for NJUL.

NJUL is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUL and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJUL and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer