NJUL vs. SPY
NJUL (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NJUL is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Invesco QQQ Trust, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJUL returned 10.86%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
NJUL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
NJUL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
NJUL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 6.16% | 15.67% | 13.93% | 29.52% | -11.67% | 7.86% | 8.28% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 21.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJUL and SPY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between NJUL and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
NJUL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJUL
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJUL
SPY
Communication Services
NJUL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
NJUL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
NJUL
SPY
Healthcare
NJUL
SPY
Industrials
NJUL
SPY
Utilities
NJUL
SPY
Basic Materials
NJUL
SPY
Energy
NJUL
SPY
Financial Services
NJUL
SPY
Real Estate
NJUL
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJUL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
NJUL
SPY
NJUL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJUL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.16 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.60 | 14.72 | +4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJUL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.38 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.82 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.59 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
NJUL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJUL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -55.19% | +40.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -8.88% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -18.76% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.37% | -24.50% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -9.05% | +6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.91% | -0.95% |
Volatility
NJUL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) is 0.40%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that NJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJUL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 2.84% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.33% | 8.90% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 11.83% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 17.05% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 17.94% | -6.88% |
NJUL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJUL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
NJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJUL and SPY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to NJUL (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUL dropped -14.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 10.86% for NJUL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUL.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for NJUL.
NJUL is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPY is S&P 500. NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUL and 0.09% for SPY.
NJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJUL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer