NJUL vs. PJUL
NJUL (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - NJUL is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Invesco QQQ Trust, while PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJUL returned 10.86%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for PJUL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
NJUL vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.74% return.
NJUL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
NJUL vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 6.16% | 15.67% | 13.93% | 29.52% | -11.67% | 7.86% | 8.28% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJUL and PJUL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between NJUL and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
NJUL vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJUL
PJUL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJUL
PJUL
Communication Services
NJUL
PJUL
Consumer Cyclical
NJUL
PJUL
Consumer Defensive
NJUL
PJUL
Healthcare
NJUL
PJUL
Industrials
NJUL
PJUL
Utilities
NJUL
PJUL
Basic Materials
NJUL
PJUL
Energy
NJUL
PJUL
Financial Services
NJUL
PJUL
Real Estate
NJUL
PJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJUL vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
NJUL
PJUL
NJUL vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 4.22 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.60 | 23.24 | -3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.73 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.90 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
NJUL vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -18.17% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -3.64% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -10.69% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.37% | -10.69% | -3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -1.47% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.66% | +0.30% |
Volatility
NJUL vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) have volatilities of 0.40% and 0.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJUL | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 0.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.33% | 3.89% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 5.66% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 8.60% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 10.03% | +1.03% |
NJUL vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NJUL and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
NJUL vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither NJUL nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJUL and PJUL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJUL has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to NJUL (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUL dropped -14.37% vs PJUL's -18.17%.
On 5-year performance, NJUL leads with 10.86% vs 10.49% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NJUL has performed better with a 10.86% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NJUL and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
NJUL and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NJUL is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PJUL is Defined Outcome. NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJUL and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer