PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJUL vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJUL vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.74% return.


NJUL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.39%
YTD
6.16%
6M
6.40%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
0.10%
1M
1.44%
YTD
4.74%
6M
5.40%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJUL vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NJUL
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July
6.16%15.67%13.93%29.52%-11.67%7.86%8.28%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.74%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NJUL and PJUL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020

0.86

The correlation between NJUL and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

NJUL vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NJUL
PJUL

Technology

54.2%
36.2%

Communication Services

15.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.4%

Industrials

2.8%
8.1%

Utilities

1.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

NJUL
54.2%
PJUL
36.2%

Communication Services

NJUL
15.5%
PJUL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NJUL
12.2%
PJUL
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

NJUL
7.6%
PJUL
4.9%

Healthcare

NJUL
4.2%
PJUL
8.4%

Industrials

NJUL
2.8%
PJUL
8.1%

Utilities

NJUL
1.4%
PJUL
2.3%

Basic Materials

NJUL
1.2%
PJUL
1.8%

Energy

NJUL
0.6%
PJUL
3.5%

Financial Services

NJUL
0.2%
PJUL
11.9%

Real Estate

NJUL
0.1%
PJUL
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJUL vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJUL
NJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJUL vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NJULPJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.59

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

4.22

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.60

23.24

-3.64

NJUL vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJUL and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NJULPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.73

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.23

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.90

+0.12

Drawdowns

NJUL vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJULPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.37%

-18.17%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-3.64%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-10.69%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.37%

-10.69%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-1.47%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.66%

+0.30%

Volatility

NJUL vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) have volatilities of 0.40% and 0.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJULPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

0.42%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

3.89%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

5.66%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.56%

8.60%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

10.03%

+1.03%

NJUL vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NJUL and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

NJUL vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NJUL nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NJUL
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


NJUL and PJUL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJUL has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to NJUL (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUL dropped -14.37% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

On 5-year performance, NJUL leads with 10.86% vs 10.49% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NJUL has performed better with a 10.86% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NJUL and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

NJUL and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NJUL is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PJUL is Defined Outcome. NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJUL and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer