NJUL vs. QQQ
NJUL (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NJUL tracks the Invesco QQQ Trust while QQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJUL returned 10.86%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
NJUL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
NJUL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
NJUL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 6.16% | 15.67% | 13.93% | 29.52% | -11.67% | 7.86% | 8.28% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJUL and QQQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NJUL and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
NJUL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJUL
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJUL
QQQ
Communication Services
NJUL
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
NJUL
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
NJUL
QQQ
Healthcare
NJUL
QQQ
Industrials
NJUL
QQQ
Utilities
NJUL
QQQ
Basic Materials
NJUL
QQQ
Energy
NJUL
QQQ
Financial Services
NJUL
QQQ
Real Estate
NJUL
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJUL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
NJUL
QQQ
NJUL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJUL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.45 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.51 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.60 | 13.49 | +6.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJUL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.64 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.41 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
NJUL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJUL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -82.97% | +68.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -11.96% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -22.77% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.37% | -35.12% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -32.79% | +30.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 3.11% | -2.15% |
Volatility
NJUL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) is 0.40%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that NJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJUL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 4.49% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.33% | 12.10% | -6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 15.94% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 22.38% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 22.29% | -11.23% |
NJUL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJUL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
NJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NJUL and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to NJUL (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUL dropped -14.37% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 10.86% for NJUL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, NJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUL.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for NJUL.
NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJUL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer