NINLX vs. GQSCX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

NINLX (Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NINLX returned 8.22%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for GQSCX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NINLX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GQSCX.

Performance

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 24.71% return.

NINLX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -2.29%
• 6M: 14.21%
• YTD: 22.19%
• 1Y: 46.12%
• 3Y*: 17.34%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: 12.25%

GQSCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.02%
• 6M: 19.44%
• YTD: 24.71%
• 1Y: 43.61%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	22.19%	18.20%	7.62%	13.89%	-20.22%	26.42%	27.14%	24.92%	-10.56%	1.27%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	24.71%	12.22%	11.49%	18.94%	-8.48%	31.77%	7.60%	22.17%	-11.32%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NINLX and GQSCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017	0.92

The correlation between NINLX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NINLX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINLX

NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 85
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GQSCX

GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NINLX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.44	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.45	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.92	5.10	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.11	18.57	-1.46

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINLX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, which is greater than GQSCX's maximum drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and GQSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NINLX	GQSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.95%	-46.87%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-8.74%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.46%	-28.83%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.71%	-28.83%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.95%	-0.16%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-8.08%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	2.47%	+0.24%

Volatility

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.97%. This indicates that NINLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NINLX	GQSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	3.97%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	12.82%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.26%	18.32%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.91%	21.82%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.08%	24.72%	-1.64%

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GQSCX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NINLX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than GQSCX's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	2.65%	3.01%	10.53%	0.70%	9.45%	10.41%	0.51%	0.59%	0.77%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	3.48%	4.25%	0.92%	0.25%	3.76%	6.40%	1.62%	2.85%	14.51%	5.19%	1.42%	5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NINLX and GQSCX in my portfolio?

NINLX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NINLX or GQSCX?

NINLX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to GQSCX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINLX dropped -59.95% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.