PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQSCX vs. GTSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQSCX achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than GTSOX's 5.84% return.


GQSCX

1D
0.45%
1M
2.00%
YTD
15.82%
6M
17.80%
1Y
44.15%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*

GTSOX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.22%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
15.82%12.22%11.49%18.94%-8.48%31.77%7.60%22.17%-11.32%1.07%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
5.84%7.73%13.79%14.59%-11.69%18.06%4.22%18.45%-4.68%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GQSCX and GTSOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017

0.71

The correlation between GQSCX and GTSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQSCX vs. GTSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQSCX
GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSOX
GTSOX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GTSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQSCXGTSOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.90

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

4.47

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.87

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

3.12

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.34

21.52

-4.18

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the GTSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQSCX and GTSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQSCXGTSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.90

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.13

Drawdowns

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQSCX drawdown since its inception was -46.87%, which is greater than GTSOX's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQSCX and GTSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQSCXGTSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.87%

-29.21%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-5.05%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.83%

-22.03%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

-22.03%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-2.97%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

0.73%

+1.75%

Volatility

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) at 0.57%. This indicates that GQSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQSCXGTSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

0.57%

+4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

5.07%

+7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

5.57%

+12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

13.18%

+8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.82%

13.45%

+11.37%

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GQSCX and GTSOX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

GQSCX vs. GTSOX - Dividend Comparison

GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than GTSOX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
2.69%3.01%10.53%0.70%9.45%10.41%0.51%0.59%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
6.90%7.47%12.31%0.00%0.00%13.35%0.00%7.56%2.62%6.57%5.01%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQSCX and GTSOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQSCX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to GTSOX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQSCX dropped -46.87% vs GTSOX's -29.21%.

GTSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQSCX and GTSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer