PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINLX vs. PSGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Growth Fund (PSGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly higher than PSGIX's 19.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NINLX having a 12.51% annualized return and PSGIX not far behind at 12.28%.


NINLX

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.12%
YTD
22.52%
6M
25.24%
1Y
58.40%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.51%

PSGIX

1D
-0.41%
1M
4.14%
YTD
19.25%
6M
19.71%
1Y
43.79%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
22.52%18.20%7.62%13.89%-20.22%26.42%27.14%24.92%-10.56%16.81%
PSGIX
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Growth Fund
19.25%15.24%14.07%18.73%-24.93%2.95%33.47%33.92%-5.01%14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NINLX and PSGIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.91

The correlation between NINLX and PSGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NINLX vs. PSGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINLX
NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PSGIX
PSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Growth Fund (PSGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINLXPSGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.11

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.83

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

3.23

+3.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.57

12.17

+10.40

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the PSGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINLX and PSGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINLXPSGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.11

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.27

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.51

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.06

Drawdowns

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, smaller than the maximum PSGIX drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and PSGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINLXPSGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.95%

-77.50%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-13.74%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

-27.77%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-40.55%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.43%

-41.59%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.78%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-25.26%

+15.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.65%

-1.06%

Volatility

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) is 5.37%, while BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Growth Fund (PSGIX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that NINLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINLXPSGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

6.35%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

15.98%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

21.42%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.77%

24.45%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.09%

24.39%

-1.30%

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PSGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NINLX vs. PSGIX - Dividend Comparison

NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than PSGIX's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
3.47%4.25%0.92%0.25%3.76%6.40%1.62%2.85%14.51%5.19%1.42%5.22%
PSGIX
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Growth Fund
0.09%0.11%0.25%0.25%0.47%18.37%5.36%5.37%24.24%11.12%0.05%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NINLX and PSGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSGIX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to NINLX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINLX dropped -59.95% vs PSGIX's -77.50%.

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINLX and PSGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer