GQSCX vs. GTLLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX).
GQSCX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Nov 13, 2017. GTLLX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Feb 27, 2004.
Performance
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | -0.65% | 12.22% | 11.49% | 18.94% | -8.48% | 31.77% | 7.60% | 22.17% | -11.32% | 1.07% |
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | -7.50% | 17.44% | 20.71% | 27.10% | -21.69% | 32.91% | 18.80% | 34.86% | -5.23% | 1.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQSCX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than GTLLX's -7.50% return.
GQSCX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
GTLLX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- -4.67%
- 1Y
- 16.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GQSCX and GTLLX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Return for Risk
GQSCX vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank
GQSCX
GTLLX
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQSCX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.74 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.20 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.74 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 3.07 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQSCX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.74 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.35 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.49 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQSCX and GTLLX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison
GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than GTLLX's 16.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 3.03% | 3.01% | 10.53% | 0.70% | 9.45% | 10.41% | 0.51% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 16.57% | 15.33% | 40.42% | 4.91% | 7.93% | 20.20% | 15.12% | 14.10% | 16.97% | 2.29% | 0.58% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQSCX drawdown since its inception was -46.87%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQSCX and GTLLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQSCX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.87% | -54.32% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -12.16% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.83% | -41.54% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -23.82% | +15.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -8.56% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.31% | +0.35% |
Volatility
GQSCX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) at 5.32%. This indicates that GQSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQSCX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 5.32% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 12.77% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 22.16% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 28.85% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 24.89% | +0.05% |