GQSCX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GQSCX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Nov 13, 2017. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
GQSCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQSCX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | -0.65% | 12.22% | 11.49% | 18.94% | -8.48% | 31.77% | 7.60% | 22.17% | -11.32% | 1.07% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 0.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQSCX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.
GQSCX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQSCX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQSCX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GQSCX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GQSCX
VOO
GQSCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQSCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.98 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.50 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.53 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 7.29 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQSCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.98 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.70 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.83 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQSCX and VOO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GQSCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 3.03% | 3.01% | 10.53% | 0.70% | 9.45% | 10.41% | 0.51% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GQSCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQSCX drawdown since its inception was -46.87%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQSCX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQSCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.87% | -33.99% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -11.98% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.83% | -24.52% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -6.29% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -3.72% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.52% | +1.14% |
Volatility
GQSCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that GQSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQSCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 5.29% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 9.44% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 18.10% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 16.82% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 17.99% | +6.95% |