NINLX vs. SMGIX

In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMGIX's -6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NINLX has underperformed SMGIX with an annualized return of 2.54%, while SMGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.13% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SMGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NINLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the SMGIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINLX and SMGIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NINLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, smaller than the maximum SMGIX drawdown of -57.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and SMGIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a higher volatility of 15.65% compared to Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) at 14.48%. This indicates that NINLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.