PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GQSCX vs. VBR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GQSCX and VBR is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

GQSCX vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
23.69%
59.01%
GQSCX
VBR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GQSCX:

-0.64

VBR:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

GQSCX:

-0.77

VBR:

0.08

Omega Ratio

GQSCX:

0.90

VBR:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

GQSCX:

-0.45

VBR:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

GQSCX:

-1.25

VBR:

-0.14

Ulcer Index

GQSCX:

12.73%

VBR:

6.83%

Daily Std Dev

GQSCX:

24.97%

VBR:

20.88%

Max Drawdown

GQSCX:

-46.87%

VBR:

-62.01%

Current Drawdown

GQSCX:

-30.93%

VBR:

-19.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQSCX achieves a -16.90% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's -12.08% return.


GQSCX

YTD

-16.90%

1M

-9.82%

6M

-26.98%

1Y

-14.77%

5Y*

9.28%

10Y*

N/A

VBR

YTD

-12.08%

1M

-8.66%

6M

-14.56%

1Y

-0.48%

5Y*

15.21%

10Y*

6.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GQSCX vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQSCX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio.


GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for GQSCX: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GQSCX: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for VBR: current value is 0.07%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VBR: 0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GQSCX vs. VBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQSCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GQSCX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GQSCX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GQSCX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GQSCX is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GQSCX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GQSCX is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VBR is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VBR is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VBR is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VBR is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VBR is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VBR is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GQSCX vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GQSCX, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
GQSCX: -0.64
VBR: -0.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for GQSCX, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GQSCX: -0.77
VBR: 0.08
The chart of Omega ratio for GQSCX, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
GQSCX: 0.90
VBR: 1.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for GQSCX, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
GQSCX: -0.45
VBR: -0.04
The chart of Martin ratio for GQSCX, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
GQSCX: -1.25
VBR: -0.14

The current GQSCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQSCX and VBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.64
-0.05
GQSCX
VBR

Dividends

GQSCX vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.94%, more than VBR's 2.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
12.94%10.80%0.70%9.45%10.41%0.51%0.59%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
2.44%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%1.77%

Drawdowns

GQSCX vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQSCX drawdown since its inception was -46.87%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -62.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQSCX and VBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-30.93%
-19.38%
GQSCX
VBR

Volatility

GQSCX vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 13.05% and 13.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.05%
13.58%
GQSCX
VBR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab