NFRX vs. MLPX
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while MLPX is passively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
NFRX vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 17.40%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.85M | $35.99M | $31.05M | |
| $1.29K | $1.57K | $3.59K |
NFRX vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 7.78% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 16.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and MLPX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPX
NFRX vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -70.67% | +63.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -3.27% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -16.47% | +14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 15.68% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 19.90% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 26.14% | -12.64% |
NFRX vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MLPX's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.05% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and MLPX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.99% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.45% for MLPX.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer