PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRX vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRX vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NFRX

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILT

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
13.47%
6M
13.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRX vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFRX and BILT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRX vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFRX vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRX vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRXBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-5.38%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-1.42%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-1.44%

-1.25%

Volatility

NFRX vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRXBILTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

10.28%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

10.28%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

10.28%

+3.59%

NFRX vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRX vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BILT's 5.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NFRX and BILT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.21% for NFRX.

They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.60% for BILT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRX and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer