NFRX vs. ECLN
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.
Performance
NFRX vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECLN
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- —
NFRX vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 6.79% |
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and ECLN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum ECLN drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and ECLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -32.28% | +25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -2.96% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -4.99% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 10.45% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.22% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 17.39% | -3.48% |
NFRX vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and ECLN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NFRX is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFRX is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.97% for ECLN.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and ECLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer