NFRX vs. PSCU
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while PSCU is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCU.
Performance
NFRX vs. PSCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 16.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.18%
NFRX vs. PSCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 6.79% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and PSCU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. PSCU — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCU
NFRX vs. PSCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. PSCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum PSCU drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and PSCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -29.97% | +22.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -5.20% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -7.65% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. PSCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 15.88% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 18.43% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 19.50% | -5.59% |
NFRX vs. PSCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCU's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. PSCU - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than PSCU's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 1.05% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and PSCU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
PSCU has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.29% for PSCU.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and PSCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer