PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEHI vs. ATMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEHI vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEHI achieves a -34.75% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 25.34% return.


NEHI

1D
-1.84%
1M
1.19%
6M
-40.24%
YTD
-34.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ATMP

1D
1.45%
1M
6.25%
6M
22.03%
YTD
25.34%
1Y
25.46%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEHI vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NEHI
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF
-34.75%-1.24%
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
25.34%0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NEHI and ATMP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEHI vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ATMP
ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEHI vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEHIATMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

NEHI vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEHI vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEHI drawdown since its inception was -50.12%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEHI and ATMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEHIATMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.12%

-80.86%

+30.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.64%

-1.90%

-39.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.78%

-30.91%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

Volatility

NEHI vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEHIATMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.31%

14.66%

+43.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.31%

22.10%

+36.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.31%

27.63%

+30.68%

NEHI vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEHI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEHI vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.09%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
0.00%0.00%
NEHI
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF
27.09%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEHI and ATMP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ATMP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ATMP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 27.09%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

NEHI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ATMP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for NEHI and 0.95% for ATMP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEHI and ATMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer