NEBX vs. HOOG
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
NEBX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 130.64% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.99% return.
NEBX
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -36.57%
- 6M
- 136.60%
- YTD
- 130.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HOOG
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -43.77%
- 6M
- -47.78%
- YTD
- -60.99%
- 1Y
- -61.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.83M | $14.42M | $16.77M | |
| $86.98M | $74.66M | $85.72M |
NEBX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 130.64% | -37.72% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -60.99% | -23.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and HOOG is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
NEBX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HOOG
NEBX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEBX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -78.64%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.64% | -86.94% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -86.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.50% | -81.80% | +15.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -41.73% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.82% | — |
Volatility
NEBX vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 209.85% | 140.37% | +69.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 209.85% | 144.04% | +65.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 209.85% | 144.04% | +65.81% |
NEBX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
NEBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 31.54% | 12.30% |
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and HOOG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.54%, compared with 0.00% for NEBX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 0.75% for HOOG.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer