NEBX vs. SMU
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
NEBX vs. SMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 130.64% return, which is significantly higher than SMU's -82.38% return.
NEBX
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -36.57%
- 6M
- 136.60%
- YTD
- 130.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SMU
- 1D
- -4.21%
- 1M
- -31.75%
- 6M
- -87.18%
- YTD
- -82.38%
- 1Y
- -98.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -98.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.98M | $74.66M | $85.72M | |
| $8.65M | $9.72M | $17.75M |
NEBX vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 130.64% | -37.72% |
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -82.38% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and SMU is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. SMU — Risk / Return Rank
NEBX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMU
NEBX vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.80 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -78.64%, smaller than the maximum SMU drawdown of -99.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and SMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.64% | -99.39% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -99.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.50% | -99.25% | +32.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -79.07% | +38.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 85.27% | — |
Volatility
NEBX vs. SMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 52.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 134.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 209.85% | 200.59% | +9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 209.85% | 200.68% | +9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 209.85% | 200.68% | +9.17% |
NEBX vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NEBX and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
NEBX vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and SMU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEBX and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
NEBX and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and SMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer