NEBX vs. GRAG
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRAG.
Performance
NEBX vs. GRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 534.26% return, which is significantly higher than GRAG's -57.47% return.
NEBX
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- 52.09%
- YTD
- 534.26%
- 6M
- 442.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRAG
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -57.47%
- 6M
- -59.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. GRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 534.26% | -24.38% |
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF | -57.47% | -5.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and GRAG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. GRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. GRAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than GRAG's maximum drawdown of -65.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and GRAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -65.33% | -12.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -61.68% | +53.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -41.61% | +2.49% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. GRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.98% | 69.97% | +122.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.98% | 69.97% | +122.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.98% | 69.97% | +122.01% |
NEBX vs. GRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GRAG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. GRAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor GRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and GRAG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.
NEBX and GRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 0.75% for GRAG.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and GRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer