PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDEC vs. ATMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDEC vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - December (NDEC) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDEC achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 22.14% return.


NDEC

1D
0.30%
1M
0.95%
6M
7.35%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ATMP

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.28%
6M
21.51%
YTD
22.14%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDEC vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NDEC
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - December
8.42%13.67%0.41%
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
22.14%1.73%-6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NDEC and ATMP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

0.14

The correlation between NDEC and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDEC vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDEC
NDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ATMP
ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDEC vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - December (NDEC) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDECATMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.68

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

6.29

+5.76

NDEC vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the ATMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDEC and ATMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDEC vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDEC drawdown since its inception was -12.98%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDEC and ATMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDECATMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-80.86%

+67.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-8.30%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.41%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-30.94%

+29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

3.52%

-2.19%

Volatility

NDEC vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - December (NDEC) is 2.73%, while Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that NDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDECATMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

5.26%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

11.41%

-4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.69%

14.50%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

22.11%

-10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

27.64%

-16.13%

NDEC vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDEC vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NDEC nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NDEC and ATMP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATMP has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to NDEC (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDEC dropped -12.98% vs ATMP's -80.86%.

On 1-year performance, ATMP leads with 21.72% vs 16.01% for NDEC. On fees, NDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ATMP has performed better with a 21.72% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

NDEC and ATMP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ATMP is MLPs. NDEC tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NDEC and 0.95% for ATMP.

NDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDEC and ATMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer