PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDARX vs. AOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDARX vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDARX achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 7.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NDARX having a 8.45% annualized return and AOR not far behind at 8.40%.


NDARX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6.53%
6M
7.20%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
8.45%

AOR

1D
0.24%
1M
2.53%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDARX vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced
6.53%17.21%11.68%12.03%-10.98%15.09%7.10%17.88%-4.99%13.62%
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
7.65%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-5.82%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NDARX and AOR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.94

The correlation between NDARX and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDARX vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDARX
NDARX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NDARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NDARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDARX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDARX vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDARXAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.89

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

12.64

-0.95

NDARX vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDARX and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDARXAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.28

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.67

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.69

+0.17

Drawdowns

NDARX vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDARX drawdown since its inception was -23.62%, roughly equal to the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDARX and AOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDARXAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.62%

-24.44%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-6.64%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-9.77%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-21.72%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.62%

-22.95%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.29%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-3.47%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.52%

0.00%

Volatility

NDARX vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) is 2.33%, while iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that NDARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDARXAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

2.66%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

6.81%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.63%

8.42%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

10.55%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.21%

10.67%

-0.46%

NDARX vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDARX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDARX vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

NDARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
NDARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced
4.91%5.78%3.07%3.37%5.60%4.29%2.91%4.03%4.29%2.68%2.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NDARX and AOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AOR has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to NDARX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDARX dropped -23.62% vs AOR's -24.44%.

NDARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDARX and AOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer