AOR vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
AOR and AOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOR and AOM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOR or AOM.
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and AOM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOR vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AOR:
1.84%
AOM:
2.79%
AOR:
-0.10%
AOM:
-0.29%
AOR:
0.00%
AOM:
-0.18%
Returns By Period
AOR
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AOM
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOR vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AOR and AOM have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOR vs. AOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AOR
AOM
AOR vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AOR vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than AOM's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -0.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
AOR vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...