AOR vs. AOA
AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) and AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - AOR tracks the S&P Target Risk Growth Index while AOA tracks the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AOR returned 8.67%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for AOA. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AOR vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 8.67%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
AOR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
AOA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 24.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
AOR vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 7.57% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 9.88% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and AOA is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AOR and AOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
AOA
AOR vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOR | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.98 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 12.96 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOR vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and AOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -28.38% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -8.20% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -12.94% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -23.62% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -28.38% | +5.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.55% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -4.04% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.88% | -0.34% |
Volatility
AOR vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) is 3.39%, while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that AOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 4.13% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 9.22% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 11.15% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.63% | 13.07% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 13.58% | -2.88% |
AOR vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AOR and AOA have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AOR vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than AOA's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.05% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AOR and AOA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AOA has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to AOR (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs AOA's -28.38%.
On 10-year performance, AOA leads with 10.91% vs 8.67% for AOR. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AOA has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR and AOA have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.05% for AOA.
AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index.
AOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOR and AOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer