PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


AOR

1D
0.22%
1M
3.07%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.80%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
8.46%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
7.96%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-5.82%15.80%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and VOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.92

The correlation between AOR and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOR
VOO

Technology

27.8%
35.7%

Financial Services

16.2%
11.6%

Industrials

11.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.2%

Communication Services

8.1%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Technology

AOR
27.8%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

AOR
16.2%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

AOR
11.9%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AOR
9.5%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

AOR
8.1%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

AOR
8.0%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

AOR
5.0%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

AOR
4.3%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

AOR
4.2%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

AOR
2.7%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

AOR
2.4%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AORVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.53

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.43

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.42

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.48

15.95

-2.46

AOR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AORVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.53

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.85

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.87

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Drawdowns

AOR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-33.99%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-8.90%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-18.69%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-24.52%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

-33.99%

+11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.69%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.91%

-0.39%

Volatility

AOR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.74%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

8.88%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

11.78%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

16.81%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

18.01%

-7.34%

AOR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AOR and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to AOR (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 8.46% for AOR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOR.

AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

AOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer