AOR vs. VOO
AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AOR returned 8.46%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
AOR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.
AOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
AOR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 7.96% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and VOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between AOR and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
AOR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOR
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOR
VOO
Financial Services
AOR
VOO
Industrials
AOR
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
AOR
VOO
Communication Services
AOR
VOO
Healthcare
AOR
VOO
Consumer Defensive
AOR
VOO
Energy
AOR
VOO
Basic Materials
AOR
VOO
Utilities
AOR
VOO
Real Estate
AOR
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
VOO
AOR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 2.53 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 3.43 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.42 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 15.95 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.53 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.89 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -33.99% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -8.90% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -18.69% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -24.52% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -33.99% | +11.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.69% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.91% | -0.39% |
Volatility
AOR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 2.74% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | 8.88% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 11.78% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 16.81% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.67% | 18.01% | -7.34% |
AOR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AOR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, AOR and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to AOR (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 8.46% for AOR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOR.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
AOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer