NDARX vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
NDARX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2015. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
NDARX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NDARX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDARX American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced | -0.59% | 17.21% | 11.68% | 12.03% | -10.98% | 15.09% | 7.10% | 17.88% | -4.99% | 13.62% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.40% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDARX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than AOM's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NDARX has outperformed AOM with an annualized return of 7.91%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.
NDARX
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 13.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
AOM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDARX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDARX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NDARX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank
NDARX
AOM
NDARX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDARX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 2.03 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.19 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 8.80 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDARX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.53 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.74 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.67 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between NDARX and AOM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NDARX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
NDARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than AOM's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDARX American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced | 5.27% | 5.78% | 3.07% | 3.37% | 5.60% | 4.29% | 2.91% | 4.03% | 4.29% | 2.68% | 2.86% | 0.00% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.99% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
NDARX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDARX drawdown since its inception was -23.62%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDARX and AOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDARX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -19.96% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -5.35% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -19.96% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.62% | -19.96% | -3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -3.30% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -2.72% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.33% | +0.35% |
Volatility
NDARX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 3.26%. This indicates that NDARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NDARX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.26% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.99% | 4.89% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.80% | 8.24% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.45% | 8.09% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 7.90% | +2.29% |