AOM vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
AOM and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOM and AOA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOM or AOA.
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and AOA is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOM vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOM:
1.47
AOA:
1.61
AOM:
2.09
AOA:
2.22
AOM:
1.27
AOA:
1.29
AOM:
1.56
AOA:
2.52
AOM:
8.56
AOA:
10.04
AOM:
1.09%
AOA:
1.56%
AOM:
6.30%
AOA:
9.73%
AOM:
-19.96%
AOA:
-28.38%
AOM:
-2.22%
AOA:
-2.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 4.69%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.
AOM
8.17%
0.02%
3.52%
8.63%
4.19%
4.69%
AOA
13.82%
-0.44%
4.76%
14.61%
8.09%
7.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOM vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AOM and AOA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOM vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOM vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than AOA's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.09% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 2.08% | 1.87% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.29% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOM vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) is 1.94%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that AOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.